Drawing for STÉRIMAR

USPTO serial 86437424

STÉRIMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STÉRIMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy L. Rowe

Nancy L. Rowe Church & Dwight Co., Inc.500 Charles Ewing BlvdLegal DepartmentEwing, NJ 08628

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated preparations for skin care, namely, creams, lotions and gels; non-medicated preparations for topical application for the relief of minor skin irritations; cosmetic creams for the skin; cosmetic creams for skin care; nourishing cosmetic creams; moisturizing cosmetic creams; non-medicated moisturizing products for the skin, namely, skin moisturizers; non-medicated cosmetic preparations for outer ear cleansingACTIVE
005Pharmaceutical and hygienic preparations for the relief of nasal congestion; medicated creams for treatment of dermatological disorders; medicated moisturizers; gels, creams and solutions for dermatological use; dermatological preparations in the form of creams, lotions and gels for the treatment of skin irritations; nasal solutions for the prevention of flu and colds; ear drops; preparations for ear cleansing and ear wax removal, namely, ear drops and ear sprays; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of ear ailmentsACTIVE
010Nasal aspirators; medical apparatus and instruments for the relief of nasal congestion, dryness and irritation, namely, neti pots for nasal lavage; nasal irrigation vessels; medical apparatus, namely, an ear wash device in the nature of a pressurized spray can with replaceable nozzles and filled with fluid for flushing ear wax from the ear; ear irrigation vesselsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 8, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 27, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 7, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 12, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 8, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jun 8, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 8, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 31, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance