Drawing for GRATEFUL HEAD

USPTO serial 86452222

GRATEFUL HEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRATEFUL HEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Schacht

DANIEL J. SCHACHT DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 HARRISON ST 25TH FLOAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public interest and awareness of marijuana and medical marijuana; promoting public interest and awareness of the benefits of medical marijuana; business consultation services in the field of marijuana and medical cannabis; consulting services in the field of marketing of educational training; dissemination of advertising material such as leaflets, brochures and printed matter; distribution of publicity materials, namely, flyers, brochures, newspapers and magazines; organization and conducting of product presentation; promoting public awareness of the need for medical marijuana; promoting public awareness of medical cannabis; advancing legal medical marijuana therapeutics and research, namely, promoting public awareness of the need for and benefit of legalization of medical marijuana; promoting public awareness of the benefit of legalization of marijuanaACTIVE
044Online medical cannabis resources, namely, providing medical information pertaining to the benefits of medicinal use of cannabisACTIVE
045Online cannabis resources, namely, providing legal information pertaining to the benefits of the legalization of cannabisACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 2, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 27, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 30, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance