USPTO serial 86454937
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
Cherry Hill, NJ, US
Other trademarks owned by AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
Cherry Hill, NJ, US
Other trademarks owned by AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
Cherry Hill, NJ, US
Other trademarks owned by AmeriQuest Business Services, Inc.
CHERRY HILL, NJ, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Kelber
Michael G. Kelber Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP225 West Randolph StreetSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Accounts receivable invoicing, namely, invoice review and correction prior to delivery, electronic invoice presentment via private labeled web portal | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 2017 |
| 038 | Electronic invoice delivery, automated email distribution of invoices | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 2017 |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for managing accounts receivable, accounts payable, credit and collections for centralized processing solutions; computer software platforms for business-to-business accounts receivable (ar) process automation and solutions; software as a service (saas) featuring computer software platforms for business-to-business accounts receivable (ar) process automation and solutions; platform as a service (paas) featuring computer software platforms for business-to-business accounts receivable (ar) process automation and solutions; electronic storage services for archiving and reporting of electronic invoice data; electronic data exchange software for business-to-business digital communication of invoices, receipts, multi format electronic advance shipment notice, direct enterprise resource planning integration, and automated business rule application for electronic documents and related services | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 2017 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |