Drawing for SENSORSHIELD

USPTO serial 86460049

SENSORSHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSORSHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judson K. Champlin

JUDSON K. CHAMPLIN Westman Champlin & Koehler P A900 2nd Ave S Ste 1400Minneapolis, MN 55402-3244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Isolating diaphragms sold as components of pressure measurement transmitters used to separate pressure sensors used in the transmitters from abrasive or corrosive process materials in enclosed conduits and containers used in industrial processes; Isolating diaphragms sold as components of industrial level measurement transmitters used to separate level sensors used in the transmitters from abrasive or corrosive process materials in enclosed conduits and containers used in industrial processesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 19, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 16, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 17, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 17, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 17, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 12, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance