USPTO serial 86461693
UNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pismo Beach, CA
Pismo Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Lebens
THOMAS F LEBENS FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 SOUTH LASALLE STREETSUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing on-line non-downloadable software for harnessing and moderating collaborative intelligence, namely, the merging of social networking and artificial intelligence technologies to enable groups of users to collaborate remotely and evoke a compute-moderated collaborative intent and/or collaborative artificial intelligence; providing on-line non-downloadable software for enabling and moderating collaborative social communities to engage in group-wise decision making, collaborative artificial intelligence, and/or collaborative control of computer interfaces and remote systems; providing on-line non-downloadable software for hosting electronic facilities for organizing and conducting real-time collaborative processes among networked groups of users; providing on-line non-downloadable software for providing a real-time social network and associated algorithms for evoking and moderating a group-wise collaborative intelligence from a distributed group of computer users that can make decisions, take actions, make predictions, or otherwise generate intentions or content as a coordinated real-time group | ABANDONED | Oct 25, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |