Drawing for MANIC

USPTO serial 86480676

MANIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BLVD2ND FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pesticides; Pesticides for agricultural useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 11, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 11, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 25, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 11, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 11, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 11, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 11, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance