Drawing for KALASHNIKOV

USPTO serial 86489847

KALASHNIKOV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALASHNIKOV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLAN Z. LITOVSKY

ALLAN Z. LITOVSKY THE LITOVSKY LAW FIRM18685 MAIN ST., #101-181HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lights for firearmsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 14, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 6, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 6, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 12, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 29, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 6, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance