USPTO serial 86499857
FORTESSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FORTESSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
Jay Begler Niesar & Vestal Llp90 New Montgomery St Fl 9San Francisco, CA 94105-4504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | knitted or woven fabric comprised of natural, synthetic, man-made fiber or blends thereof for the manufacture of apparel; upholstery fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |