USPTO serial 86509184
LUPPIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUPPIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Asplin
PATRICK C ASPLIN LENHART PETTIT530 E MAIN ST, PO BOX 2057CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and one-on one mentoring in the fields of Lupus, Lupus treatment options and the importance of clinical trials; training Lupus patients to teach other Lupus patients about the nature of Lupus, available treatments and the importance of clinical trials | ABANDONED | Nov 17, 2014 |
| 045 | Organizing and conducting support groups for Lupus patients who are undergoing treatment and clinical trials, and for the caregivers of Lupus patients who are undergoing treatment and clinical trials | ABANDONED | Nov 17, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |