USPTO serial 86518918
COLLABORATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLLABORATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A. Murray, Jr.
KENNETH A. MURRAY, JR. Murray Tech Law132 E St Ste 310Davis, CA 95616-4793UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitating the interoperability of multiple software applications; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating, editing, delivering, and monitoring multimedia presentations distributed via the Internet and telephone to multiple participants; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software to facilitate the electronic transmission of information, data, documents, voice, video and images over the Internet; Software as a Services (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitating multimedia teleconferencing and videoconferencing services, instant messaging, electronic mail and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) communication services; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software which allows users to participate in web-based meetings, presentations, seminars and classes, with access to data, documents, images and software applications through a web browser; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for accessing, viewing, and controlling remote computers and computer networks; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software to enable users to search and locate information and people, communicate, collaborate, and share computer screens, desktops, data, electronic documents and applications; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for viewing, sharing, managing and editing documents and electronic whiteboards; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for recording meetings; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for placing, receiving and controlling phone calls; providing online information regarding computer hardware and software; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, form virtual communities, engage in social networking, and exchange documents; technology advice provided to Internet users by means of a support hotline; technical consultation regarding computer hardware, computer software, computer systems, computer networks, and intranets; online meeting and event support services, namely, conducting online meetings and events for customers, and online distribution of materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |