USPTO serial 86520045
IHD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALASHEVICH, JASON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Cronk
PETER J. CRONK DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH ST FL 5PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Abrading and grooving machines and parts thereof; abrasive grinding products being parts of machines; cutting machines; cutting tools being cutting wheels and cutting blades, diamond cutting wheels and diamond cutting blades and wire cutting cable; machine tools, machine wheels, grinding wheels, being abrasive cut off wheels, abrasive depressed center wheels; core drilling bits; grinding wheels and grinding plates being parts of machines; machine saws and blades therefor; drilling machines; drills for drilling machines; grinding machines, sharpening machines and sanding machines and buffers being parts of machines; power driven electric angle grinders; petrol hand held saws, table tile saws, rail tile saws, masonry saws, large block saws, floor saws; portable handheld core drill motors, core drill rigs and motors; mechanical power floats; wall saw machines; wire cable machines; power-operated saws, namely walk behind flat saws; power driven floor grinders and polishers, diamond segments, diamond wings, tuck point and mortar rankers, namely, diamond blades to remove joints on a wall of bricks, joint sealers, cup wheels and core bits; all the aforementioned goods being intended for cutting and/or grinding building materials and abrasive materials namely, concrete and concrete products, reinforced and non-reinforced concrete, cured concrete, green concrete, asphalt over concrete, kerb stone, concrete pipes, engineering bricks, facing bricks, flagstone and paving stone, block paving, washed gravel concrete slabs, natural stone, sandstone, flint, limestone, granite, marble, slate, hard natural stone, porcelain, ceramic, vitrified reconstructed stone, refractory materials, thin steels sections, stainless steel, cast iron, mortars, glass, bitumen, cement joints, breeze block, lignacite blocks and other materials for the construction and building industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |