USPTO serial 86520547
SCI INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCI INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Analyzing educational tests scores and data for others; Analyzing of educational test scores and data for others; Career counseling, namely, providing advice concerning education options to pursue career opportunities; Consultation in the field of K-12 educational systems; Education services, namely, mentoring in the field of standardized test preparation; Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the field of standardized test preparation; Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the fields of standardized test preparation; Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, tutoring, and mentoring in the field of middle and high school reform; Education services, namely, providing kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) classroom instruction; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line classes and seminars in the field of standardized test preparation; Education services, namely, providing mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars and workshops in the field of standardized test preparation; Education services, namely, providing on-line classes and seminars in the field of standardized test preparation; Educational counseling services to assist students in planning and preparing for further education; Educational examination services; Educational services, namely, conducting distance learning instruction at the primary and secondary levels; Educational services, namely, conducting distance learning instruction at the secondary level; Educational services, namely, conducting informal on-line programs in the fields of standardized test preparation and printable materials distributed therewith; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for educators; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for teachers; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of standardized test preparation; Educational testing services; Information on education; Providing educational assessment services; Providing information about education; Providing information and news in the field of teaching methodology and education; Providing information relating to education services for children | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hou, Yau-Fen
- Other trademarks owned by Hou, Yau-Fen
- Other trademarks owned by Kuo, Pei Jun
- Other trademarks owned by Kuo, Pei Jun
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SCI INSTITUTE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |