USPTO serial 86521868
VISUAL IP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VISUAL IP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia M. ARKO
CYNTHIA M. ARKO Eip US Llp2468 Historic Decatur Rd Ste 200San Diego, CA 92106-6131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business advisory, consultancy and information services in relation to the development and management of intellectual property rights; business advisory, consultancy and information services in relation to technology exploitation and technology commercialisation; providing a searchable online database in the field of patents and patent applications; providing a searchable online database in the field of utility models, registered designs and trademarks; preparing reports on intellectual property landscapes; analysing and assessing intellectual property rights; electronic data processing services in the field of intellectual property rights and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and hosting of web portals; designing, creating, maintaining and hosting computer software in relation to the identification and management of intellectual property rights; designing, creating, maintaining and hosting computer software in relation to technology exploitation and technology commercialisation; designing, creating, maintaining and hosting patent landscaping software; designing, creating, maintaining and hosting intellectual property landscaping software; computer services, namely, creating interactive online databases featuring information on the analysis, evaluation and creation of patents; technical data analysis services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Professional advisory and consultancy services in relation to intellectual property rights, namely, patents, registered designs, utility models and trademarks; legal research and investigation services in relation to industrial property and intellectual property rights, namely, patents, registered designs, utility models and trademarks; providing online databases featuring intellectual property information; preparing reports featuring intellectual property information; intellectual property analysis services; intellectual property audits; legal advisory and consultancy services in relation to technology and innovation management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |