USPTO serial 86529674
GIGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William S. Parks
WILLIAM S PARKS William S. Parks, PLLC172 W. Viking Dr.Cordova, TN 38018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio headphones and earphones including wired and wireless headphones and earphones and audio headphones and earphones with noise canceling features | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |