USPTO serial 86548659
THE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | application service provider featuring software for use in the operation of computers; computer software for network management; application service provider featuring software used to monitor, test, enhance, accelerate, and manage the performance of wide area, local area, or global networks; application service provider featuring software used to improve the performance of computer applications, servers, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area and global networks; application service provider featuring software to facilitate data storage; application service provider featuring software for the transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network, transmitting and sharing of global network traffic, data, and information across computer networks; application service provider featuring software for optimizing, enhancing, accelerating, and managing the performance, security, and delivery of computer application traffic, computer applications, websites, and data over networks; application service provider featuring software for use in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks, for computer network traffic management, for providing traffic management, application acceleration, application and network security, and server optimization, to deliver, deploy and manage software applications and data over computers networks, and facilitating application, website and data deployment, management, security and access across computer networks; application service provider featuring operating system software that facilitates application, website and data deployment, management, security and access across computer networks; application service provider featuring software for the creation of firewalls; application service provider featuring software used to monitor, analyze, manage, assess and anticipate trends, troubleshoot, record, and enhance the performance and security of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols of computer networks; application service provider featuring software for installing, monitoring, managing, troubleshooting, diagnosing, verifying, and supporting telecommunication networks and related services; application service provider featuring software allowing collection, archiving, normalization, reporting, and analysis of network and infrastructure data, namely, topology, configuration, performance, and traffic data, and other related application performance data; application service provider featuring software for network management and troubleshooting for use in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, software development, and software testing; application service provider featuring software for network simulation; application service provider featuring software monitor and analyze web-based applications to better understand the end-user experience and maximize end-user performance; application service provider featuring software in the field of web analytics to host software that collects, manages, integrates, analyzes, monitors, and tracks the performance of websites through web user behavior; application service provider featuring software for analyzing the application components that comprise an executed transaction end-to-end; application service provider featuring software for proactively monitoring and auditing activity and usage between users and databases; application service provider featuring software for use in monitoring, diagnosing, and analyzing the performance of multi-tier applications; application service provider featuring software for the transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network; consulting in the field of computer hardware, software, and networking technology and information technology; computer hardware and software consulting services; computer diagnostic services; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others for the purpose of certification in the field of computer hardware, software, and networking technology and information technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |