USPTO serial 86554486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Palo Alto, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. JAFFER
DAVID H. JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500-IP GROUPMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of developer platforms, software accessed over networks such as the Internet and downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications used to learn, visualize, predict, diagnose, classify, simulate and problem solve, to provide planning and decisions, case-based reasoning, and mode knowledge and information, to create knowledge-intensive applications and solutions, to perform knowledge discovery, decision processing, problem solving, analysis of data and decision and knowledge management and reporting, for controlling systems, devices, sensors, language processors, memory applications and application programming interfaces, for operating educational/teaching apparatus, including robots, and personal digital/data assistants and for creating cognitive, social and emotional modules and other artificially intelligent software technologies, wherein such software can interact with humans and other software all for use in the fields of artificial intelligence, robotics, natural language processors, algorithms, machine learning technology, case based reasoning technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software development, including development of developer platforms, software accessed over networks such as the Internet and downloadable software such as mobile applications for use in the fields of artificial Intelligence, robotics, natural language processors, algorithms, machine learning technology, case based reasoning technology; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software in the nature of developer platforms and software accessed over networks such as the Internet used to learn, visualize, predict, diagnose, classify, simulate and problem solve, to provide planning and decisions, case-based reasoning, and mode knowledge and information, to create knowledge-intensive applications and solutions, to perform knowledge discovery, decision processing, problem solving, analysis of data and decision and knowledge management and reporting, for controlling systems, devices, sensors, language processors, memory applications and application programming interfaces, for operating educational/teaching apparatus, including robots, and personal digital/data assistants and for creating cognitive, social and emotional modules and other artificially intelligent software technologies, wherein such software can interact with humans and other software all for use in the fields of artificial Intelligence, robotics, natural language processors, algorithms, machine learning technology, case based reasoning technology | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |