USPTO serial 86557313
Serial No. 86557313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5281639Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2017
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86557313?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Douglaston, NY
Douglaston, NY
Douglaston, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hui Chen
KAI HUANG4605 HANFORD STREETDOUGLASTON, NY 11362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; biscuits and bread; bread; bread and buns; bread and pastry; bread bases; bread crumb; bread crumbs; bread doughs; bread flavoured with spices; bread mixes; bread pudding; bread rolls; bread sticks; bread with soy bean; bruschetta-topped bread; burgers contained in bread rolls; candies; candy; candy bars; candy cake decorations; candy coated apples; candy coated popcorn; candy containing alcoholic beverage content and flavor; candy decorations for cakes; candy for food; candy mints; candy necklaces; candy sprinkles; candy with caramel; candy with cocoa; candy, namely, dragées; chocolate candies; chocolate covered cookies; chocolate for confectionery and bread; chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; coatings for foods made of breading; cookie dough; cookie mixes; cookie pies; cookies; cookies and crackers; cookies with nuts; corn bread; cotton candy; crisp bread; Danish bread; edible cookie dough not intended for baking; flat bread; food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; fortune cookies; fried dough cookies (karintoh); frozen breads; frozen cookie, brownie and biscotti dough; frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; fruit breads; fruit jelly candy; garlic bread; gift baskets containing candy; gluten-free bread; gummy candies; ice candies; low-salt bread; Mexican candy; mixes for candy making; mixes for making breading; naan bread; pan de yuca; peppermint candy; pita bread; potato rolls; protein reduced and gluten free flour and bread; rolls; rye bread; sandwich wraps; spreads consisting primarily of emulsified biscuits or cookies; starch-based candies (ame); stuffing mixes containing bread; sugarless candies; sweets; unleavened bread in thin sheets; vegan cookies; wholemeal bread | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2019 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |