USPTO serial 86560435
NEVERFROST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEVERFROST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schnurr
DAVID SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVD., SUITE 300WATERLOO, N2L6R5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Polymer films for application to windows, vehicle windows and windshields in order to protect same from stone chips; polymer films for application to windows, vehicle windows and windshields in order to insulate same from solar heat; polymer films for application to windows, vehicle windows and windshields in order to repel snow, ice and freezing rain; surface coating compositions, namely, chemical coatings for use on windshields and windows; chemical preparations for preventing the formation of ice on exposed surfaces; surface coating compositions, namely, anti-reflective coatings for use on windshields and windows; and polymer films for protecting surfaces on automobiles, trucks, vans, buses and trains from damage or abuse | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |