USPTO serial 86565325
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Voelzke
JOEL D. VOELZKE Ip Law Office Of Joel Voelzke Apc24772 W Saddle Peak RdMalibu, CA 90265-3042UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to virtual computing environments consisting of virtualized computer hardware, computer software and data storage facilities through the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and conferences in the fields of internet website development, internet website hosting, ecommerce, cloud computing, and cloud data storage, and distribution of training materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hosting websites of others; providing a broad array of non-downloadable applications software for others to use over a global computer network, namely, non-downloadable software designed to collect, track, store, and organize data; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; computer services, namely, providing a virtual computing environment accessible via the Internet for the purpose of using computing and data storage facilities of variable capacity; rental of database servers to third parties accessible via the Internet; rental of database servers of variable capacity to third parties via the Internet; cloud computing, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; recovery of computer data; remote computer backup services; remote online backup of computer data; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for creating and deploying internet and web-based applications including hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) applications, the platform including computer language interpreters and libraries; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the user to publish and share their own content and images on-line; hosting the software, websites and other computer applications of others on a virtual private server; Internet-based application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining the code, applications, and software for web sites of others. providing a web hosting platform for use by others to publish content on-line; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in developing mobile websites, for use in converting websites to mobile websites, and for optimizing websites for use and access by mobile devices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for building websites, for use in developing mobile websites, for use in converting websites to mobile websites, and for optimizing websites for use and access by mobile devices; hosting an online website featuring website builder non-downloadable software; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for building websites; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software used to store and share data, documents, files, information, text, photos, images, graphics, music, audio, video, and multimedia content with others via global computer networks, mobile telephones, and other communications networks for the purpose of file back up and synchronization; hosting of digital content on the internet; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; electronic storage of files and documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |