USPTO serial 86567743
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) DNA chips and Protein chip scanners for laboratory purposes; Pillar chips comprising plates, glass slides or chips having multi-well arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific, laboratory or medical research use; Slide chips for laboratory purposes; High resolution power cell analyzing apparatus for laboratory purposes; Chips used in high resolution power cell analyzing apparatus for laboratory purposes; Microfluidic analyzing apparatus for laboratory purposes; ] Cell counter for laboratory purposes; [ Cell toxicity assessment chips for laboratory purposes; Cell cultivating chips for laboratory purposes; ] Chips used in cell reader for laboratory purposes [ ; Chips used in milk quality analyzing apparatus for laboratory purposes; Subminiature microfluidic chips for laboratory purposes; Plastic chips having multi-well arrays for chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for laboratory purposes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) DNA chips and Protein chip scanners for medical purposes; Slide chips for medical purposes; High resolution power cell analyzing apparatus for medical purposes; ] Cell counter for medical purposes; [ Cell toxicity assessment chips for medical purposes; Cell cultivating chips for medical purposes; ] Chips used in cell reader for medical purposes [ ; Chips used in milk quality analyzing apparatus for medical purposes; Plastic chips having multi-well arrays for chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for medical purposes; Chips used in blood coagulation measuring instruments for medical purposes; Serum separation chips for medical purposes; Chips used in micro gene amplifiers for medical purposes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ (Based on 44(e)) Commercial intermediary services in the field of medical machines and apparatus; Sales arranging of medical machines and apparatus; Commercial intermediary services in the field of machines and devices for physics and chemistry; Sales arranging of machines and devices for physics and chemistry; Commercial intermediary services in the field of electronic application machines and their parts; Sales arranging of electronic application machines and their parts ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 1, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |