USPTO serial 86570680
PRANIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRANIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Sherman
3874 Tampa RdOldsmar, FL 34677-3126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Amla oil for cosmetic purposes; Argan oil for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Cleansing milk for cosmetic purposes; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coconut oil for cosmetic purposes; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic massage creams; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for protecting the skin from the sun's rays; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming creams; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming lotions; Cosmetic preparations, namely, skin balsams; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skincare; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic skin fresheners; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun milk lotions; Cosmetic sun oils; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetics sold as an integral component of non-medicated skincare preparations; Flower essences for cosmetic purposes; Gels for cosmetic purposes; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Plant and herb extracts sold as components of cosmetics; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Wrinkle-minimizing cosmetic preparations for topical facial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |