Drawing for ECOTECH

USPTO serial 86573237

ECOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

GREGORY J CHINLUND Marshall Gerstein & Borun Llp233 S WACKER DR FL 63CHICAGO, IL 60606-6357UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoe components, namely, shoe soles, shoe uppers; shoe in-solesACTIVE
028Sporting goods, namely, protective padding for playing football, lacrosse, hockey, soccer, boxing, baseball, and skateboardingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 28, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 28, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 22, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 22, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 22, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 22, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 17, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 17, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 12, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 12, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 12, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Jun 16, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 14, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 14, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance