USPTO serial 86589796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Benton Harbor, MI
Benton Harbor, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine S. Collins
CATHERINE S COLLINS WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD900 FIFTH THIRD CENTER111 LYON STREET NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; athletic pants; athletic shirts; athletic shoes; T-shirts; pajamas; bathrobes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |