USPTO serial 86609478
MOVETV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOVETV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian L. Saffer
Ian L. Saffer Swanson & Bratschun, LLC8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Custom design, engineering, and integration of computer systems and networks, namely, integration of cable television systems, multimedia content distribution systems, and video and audio communications systems; Design and planning of cable television systems, content distribution systems, and communications systems; technical support, namely, monitoring of cable television systems, content distribution systems, and communications systems; technical consultation and computer software consultation in the field of broadband communications systems; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software for others; customization of computer software for others; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for electronic transmission and delivery of audio, video and multimedia content; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use by the broadband communications and cable industries for use in network management and for customer account management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for electronic commerce, video-on-demand, interactive online games, browsing the Internet, and sending and receiving email and instant messages; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in connection with monitoring software performance, collecting and analyzing customer data for sales and marketing purposes, managing customer accounts and customer access, and tracking and directing advertising to customers; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the operation of cable television systems, content distribution systems, and communication systems; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for facilitating video communications between parties; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for uploading, posting, displaying, editing, organizing, transmitting, sharing and tagging video, images, audio and content; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for accessing the Internet and computer networks; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for wireless or remote connectivity to computer networks, applications, devices, systems, communication equipment, video equipment, telecommunications equipment, peripherals, and databases; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the transmission of voice, data, audio, and video; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing video, audio, data, video game, and telephone communications and transmissions; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for sending, storing, managing, integrating and accessing voice, video, images, data and text and voice messages via telephones, computers, set top boxes, electronic mail, pagers, personal digital assistants, computer peripherals, and internal and global computer networks; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in computer system and device backup, recovery, and restoration; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for computer anti-virus protection; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for computer security; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in securing video delivery networks; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for privacy control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISH Technologies L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MOVETV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |