Drawing for CALICO COTTAGE

USPTO serial 86633352

CALICO COTTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALICO COTTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn S. Fruchter

LYNN S. FRUCHTER COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PROCESSED BEANS; PROCESSED EDIBLE SEEDS; PROCESSED FRUITS; PROCESSED VEGETABLESACTIVE
030PROCESSED OATS; COFFEE BEANS; GRANOLAACTIVE
031UNPROCESSED OATS; UNPROCESSED BEANS; FRESH FRUIT; FRESH VEGETABLESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 2, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 1, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 20, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 20, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 3, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 3, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 3, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
May 3, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 1, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Nov 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 12, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 21, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance