USPTO serial 86649059
SYSTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2017
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SYSTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Johnson Walden
Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.PO Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, a platform that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; software for database management in the fields of the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; computer programs, namely, software for generating, processing, storing and comparing anti-counterfeit attributes from marked features in a supply chain operation | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
| 035 | Data management services for use in supply chain operation serialization | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
| 037 | Customizing computer components, namely, computer hardware used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer hardware for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing computer hardware used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
| 042 | Customizing computer software used in manufacturing for packaging and optimizing line performance that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used in manufacturing for packaging; customizing computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; computer software consultation for software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; computer software consultation for software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; computer software consultation for software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; computer software consultation for software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for project and program management in the field of serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for a supply chain operation | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SYSTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 24, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |