USPTO serial 86657257
GT WATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUCHA, JOHN EVAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GT WATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Shenzhen, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Alarm clocks; Cases for clock and watch-making; Cases for watches and clocks; Chronographs as watches; Clocks; Clocks and watches; Straps for wristwatches; Sundials; Watch cases; Watch chains; Watches; Wrist watches | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |