USPTO serial 86662454
VIPERSPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHERY, JEFFREY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPERSPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hunting supplies, namely, laser pointing devices for use with firearms, telescopic gun sights, gun scopes | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2014 |
| 013 | Hunting Supplies, namely, rifles, muzzle breaks for firearms, mounts for attaching gun sights to firearms, tactical rails for firearms, firearm attachments, namely, modular external rail systems for firearms, and magazines for firearms | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |