USPTO serial 86664416
MACH 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACH 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, and computer hardware, for the creation and delivery of three-dimensional spatial sound, namely, virtual reality sound delivered via a device or headset such as a full head set, augmented reality sound delivered via a device or headset such as a glasses overlay or headphones, and mixed reality sound that includes a blend of virtual reality sound and augmented reality sound delivered via a device or headset, all for film, games, television, video, and other forms of media; Consumer products in the nature of a head-mounted display virtual reality headset for the creation and delivery of three-dimensional spatial sound, namely, virtual reality sound, augmented reality sound, or mixed-reality sound, for use in connection with mobile phones, computers, televisions, and head mounted displays (HMD's) and optical head-mounted displays (OHMD's); consumer products, namely, a headset, headphones, and glasses overlay device in the nature of a head-mounted virtual reality headset and a device that attaches to glasses such as a head mounted display and optical head-mounted display to be used for the creation and delivery of three-dimensional spatial sound, namely, virtual reality sound, augmented reality sound, or mixed-reality sound that includes a blend of virtual reality sound and augmented reality sound; all of the foregoing for use with viewing film, television, video, and other forms of media not including gaming devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |