USPTO serial 86692308
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plymouth, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald E. Helget
GERALD E. HELGET Briggs Morgan80 S 8th St Ste 2200Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games, playthings and accessories therefor, namely, toy figures, dolls, toy animals with globe-shaped containers and globe-shaped toy dispensers sold as a unit therewith, toy animals, toy ponies, toy horses, toy dogs, toy puppies, toy cats, toy kittens, toy dolls, toy babies, toy vehicles, storage bags, display cases, and cases sold as a unit therewith; play houses and toy accessories therefor, toy play sets for action figures, toy play sets for children to imitate real life occupations; puzzles; doll accessories, jewelry, sunglasses, radios, cameras, cosmetics, health and beauty aids in the nature of hair brushes, combs, and hair dryers, toy housewares, toy cookware, doll's houses, and play sets for children to imitate real life occupations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |