USPTO serial 86693281
OPTIMA PREDICT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2017
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OPTIMA PREDICT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OSLO, NO
THE OPTIMA CORPORATION LIMITED
AUCKLAND CBD, AUCKLAND, NZ
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, US
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, US
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, US
OSLO, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Espenshade
Steven M. Espenshade Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for simulation and planning for use by transport, medical and emergency service providers to manage and optimize asset allocation and utilization in the delivery of transportation services, medical transportation services and emergency transportation services based on location, coverage, roster, scheduling, staffing, and cost benefit analysis, and manuals and instructional materials sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consultation services, namely, simulation and planning consultation and real time analysis of costs for optimized deployment of assets based on time and location information, coverage, roster, scheduling, and staffing for use in association with transportation providers, medical and emergency transport providers, medical providers, emergency service providers; providing information and recommendations regarding cost assessments, time and location analysis, coverage, roster, scheduling, and staffing, in the medical and emergency transport, medical and emergency service provider fields, and transportation fields; provide predictive cost analysis services, location and time analysis services, coverage, roster, scheduling and staffing, to medical and emergency transport providers, medical providers, emergency services providers, and transportation providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Consultation services, namely, consultation and real time travel route analysis to optimize deployment of travel assets based on time, location, and scheduling travel, as it pertains to medical and emergency transportation services for use in association with transport providers, medical providers and emergency service providers; Consultation services, namely, transportation consultation and real time travel route analysis to optimize deployment of travel assets based on time, location, and scheduling, as it pertains to transportation of goods and people in association with transport providers, medical providers and emergency service providers; Providing transportation information and recommendations in the field of medical and emergency transportation services for use by providers of transport, medical and emergency services; Provide predictive transportation routing analysis regarding medical and emergency transportation services for use by transport providers, medical providers and emergency services providers; Providing predictive analysis regarding route analysis in the field of transportation of goods and people for use by transport providers, medical providers and emergency services providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for time, location and cost analysis and for simulation and planning for use by transport, medical and emergency service providers to manage and optimize asset allocation and utilization in the delivery of medical and emergency transportation services based on location, coverage, roster, scheduling, and staffing, and manuals and instructional materials sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OMDA AS
- Other trademarks owned by THE OPTIMA CORPORATION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Intermedix Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intermedix Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intermedix Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CSAM HEALTH GROUP AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPTIMA PREDICT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 29, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |