Drawing for BE UNCOMMON

USPTO serial 86693524

BE UNCOMMON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE UNCOMMON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Tamaroff

DAVID TAMAROFF LIPSCOMB & PARTNERS PLLC25 SE 2ND AVE8TH FLOORMIAMI, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Negotiation and renegotiation for others of leases and subleases and real estate purchase agreements; Real estate advertising servicesACTIVEJul 1, 2016
036Providing real estate listings and real estate information via the Internet; Real estate agencies; Real estate brokerageACTIVEJul 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 30, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 30, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 16, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 28, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 28, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 1, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Jun 1, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 18, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 24, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 8, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 14, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 14, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance