USPTO serial 86694721
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven N. Terranova
STEVEN N. TERRANOVA WITHROW & TERRANOVA, PLLC106 Pinedale Springs WayCary, NC 27511UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for fermenting wine, sulfite for preserving wine, enzymes for use in the manufacture of alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal caps for jars and bottles; metal caps for jars and bottles with delayed release oxygen insert cartridges and tablets; metal barrels | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Test equipment employing voltammetry for analyzing polyphenol levels in wine; voltammetric sensors; computer software which enables recommendations to be made regarding wine bottle container closure formation | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Synthetic rubber stoppers for use as closures for bottles; Synthetic plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacturing of closures for bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Synthetic non-metallic and non-paper closures and caps for cartons, containers, and bottles; corks, stoppers of natural cork; stoppers of cork imitation; stoppers of cork containing natural cork and cork imitation; corks for bottles; natural corks for bottles; imitation corks for bottles; corks containing natural cork and imitation cork for bottles; stoppers of cork or cork imitations for jars and bottles; stoppers of cork or cork imitations for bottles with delayed release oxygen insert cartridges and tablets; synthetic cork or cork imitation stoppers for bottles; wood barrels; non-metal barrels | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services in the field of oenology, namely, providing research and development of technology in the field of oenology; research and development of new wine products; research and analysis in the fields of oenology, chemistry and biology | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 31, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |