Drawing for DRIVESAFE

USPTO serial 86695825

DRIVESAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EBAUGH, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIVESAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jami A. Gekas

JAMI A GEKAS FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 N CLARK ST STE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60654-5313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote teen driver monitoring system for parents comprised of a wireless-capable telematics device and a downloadable mobile application providing driving summary and information with regard to a specific vehicle, a map interface, alerts and mobile settings; none of the foregoing for use in connection with driver or motor vehicle recordsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 23, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 18, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jul 9, 2017EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 22, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 12, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 12, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 12, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 18, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 18, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 18, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 20, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance