Drawing for FUNPLUS

USPTO serial 86697407

FUNPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FUNPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kao H. Lu

Kao H. LU LanWay IPR ServicesP.O. BOX 230970CENTREVILLE, VA 20120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Ball pitching machines; Board games; Body-training apparatus; Fishing tackle; Games adapted for use with television receivers; Golf gloves; LCD game machines; Ring games; Toy cars; Video game machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 6, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 6, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 6, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 6, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 18, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 24, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance