USPTO serial 86714680
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Y. Park
JAE Y PARK KILE PARK REED & HOUTTEMAN PLLC1101 30TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-3772UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Incense, Aromatics for household purposes in the nature of aromatic potpourris, Aromatics for household purposes in the nature of fragrance sachets, Aromatics for household purposes in the nature of aromatic reed diffusers comprised of scented oils and also including reeds and a diffuser container, Air fragrancing preparations, Fragrance for household purposes, Aromatics for automobiles in the nature of fragrance sachets, Aromatics for automobiles in the nature of aromatic potpourris, Aromatics for automobiles in the nature of aromatic reed diffusers comprised of scented oils and also including reeds and a diffuser container, Potpourris fragrances, Paper type air fragrancing preparations, Canned air fragrancing preparations, Scented wood, Fragrances sold in the form of scented paper, Extracts of flowers sold as components of perfumes, Bases for flower perfumes, namely, perfumed extracts for flower perfumes | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | Rosemary candles, Candles containing insect repellent, Perfumed candles, Tallow candles, Aromatherapy fragrance candles, Aromatic candles, Candles, Beeswax for use in the manufacture of candles, Wicks for candles, Bougies in the nature of wax candles, Beeswax for use in further manufacture, Candles for night lights, Candles and wicks for candles for lighting, Illuminating wax in the nature of candles, Tealights in the nature of tea light candles, Tealight candles, Paraffin, Paraffin wax, Scented candles | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |