USPTO serial 86721271
KELVIN STORAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2020
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KELVIN STORAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen C. Kline
Karen C. Kline DUANE MORRIS LLP1875 NW Corporate Blvd, Suite 300BR-IPDBoca Raton, FL 33431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Consultation concerning the storage of energy in thermal energy storage and conversion systems; energy consulting services concerning the storage of energy for power generation facilitating renewable energy storage facilities; and energy consulting concerning the storage of energy for oil and gas production facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelvin Storage Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KELVIN THERMAL ENERGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KELVIN THERMAL ENERGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KELVIN THERMAL ENERGY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named KELVIN STORAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2020 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 6, 2020 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |