Drawing for SOMA MESSENGER

USPTO serial 86729880

SOMA MESSENGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOMA MESSENGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Vogl and Kristin S. Cornuelle

PETER D VOGL ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN STSTE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8280

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites in the fields of personal productivity, wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 6, 2017EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Apr 10, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 16, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 16, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 16, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 15, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 15, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance