USPTO serial 86743277
MAENIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAENIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Shaddock II
PETER A. SHADDOCK II Shaddock Law Group Pc1209 Independence Blvd Ste 106Virginia Beach, VA 23455-5569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective work gloves; Protective gloves for industrial use; Gloves for protection against accidents; Fire resistant gloves; Diving gloves; Bullet resistant vests; Bullet-proof clothing; Bullet resistant clothing; Bullet-proof personal protection shields in the form of a backpack; Rifle scopes; Telescopic sights for firearms; Protective lens covers for telescopic gun sights; Protective rifle scope covers, protective covers specially adapted for use with optical rifle scopes, spotting scopes, binoculars, and night vision devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |