USPTO serial 86754143
KINETIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KINETIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith Llp550 W Adams St Ste 300Chicago, IL 60661-3607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in healthcare and research for the management and administration of research for the protection of research participants by automating and facilitating the conduct of research studies, consent of research participants, and management of meetings where research studies are reviewed. Technology consulting services in the field of healthcare and research regarding technology solutions for research studies to ensure participant protection, and for the automation and facilitation of the conduct of research studies and electronic consent of research participants | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of healthcare and research, namely providing regulatory compliance consulting in the field of medical research studies to protect research participants and to ensure regulatory compliance and efficient research study operation, to provide independent review of research involving human subjects, namely, reviewing protocols and related information to ensure protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects; regulatory compliance consulting services in the field of healthcare and research studies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |