USPTO serial 86758176
SMALL BITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMALL BITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Eastley
HEB Grocery Company, LP HEB Grocery Company, LP646 South Flores StreetCorporate Law DepartmentSan Antonio, TX 78204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | NUTS; CANDIED NUTS; SEASONED NUTS; ROASTED NUTS; PROCESSED NUTS; DRIED FRUITS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING OF DEHYDRATED FRUIT AND PROCESSED NUTS; TRAIL MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED NUTS; TRAIL MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED NUTS, AND ALSO INCLUDING SEEDS, PRETZELS, DRIED FRUIT, CHOCOLATE, OR CANDIES; CUT FRUIT AND PROCESSED NUT COMBINATIONS; GUACAMOLE; CUT VEGETABLES; CUT FRUITS; CHEESES; MEATS; POULTRY; SEAFOOD, NOT LIVE; LUNCHEON MEATS; CUT VEGETABLES WITH DAIRY-BASED DIP; CHEESE AND CRACKER COMBINATIONS; PACKAGED MEAL COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT OR CHEESE OR VEGETABLES OR FRUITS; MEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS; NUT-BASED SNACK FOODS; VEGETABLE-BASED SNACK FOODS; FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOODS; STUFFED JALAPENO PEPPERS, BREADED JALAPENO PEPPERS, JALAPENO PEPPERS, BREADED MUSHROOMS, STUFFED MUSHROOMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | CANDY; CHOCOLATES; CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS; CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS; CHOCOLATE COVERED FRUITS; YOGURT COVERED PRETZELS; YOGURT COVERED NUTS; YOGURT COVERED FRUITS; GRANOLA; GRANOLA SNACKS; PICO DE GALLO; SALSAS; PARFAITS; PACKAGED COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRACKERS OR PASTA OR RICE OR GRAINS; GRAIN-BASED CHIPS AND SALSA OR SAUCES; GRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS; PROCESSED GRAINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |