USPTO serial 86772109
MEDNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Scott Keller
R. Scott Keller Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon St NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical consultations provided via phone, online chat or videoconferencing; telemedicine services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |