USPTO serial 86778397
AIDILIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIDILIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa A. Ignacio,
VANESSA A. IGNACIO, Lowenstein Sandler Llp65 Livingston AveRoseland, NJ 07068-1725UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, computers, handheld computers and mobile computing devices, namely, software for securely transmitting, receiving, storing, integrating, tracking and managing patient-authorized, HIPAA-compliant sharing of text, data, images, photos, videos, messages and patient authorized medical information, for two-way messaging, collaborating with health care professionals, coordinating patient medical care, and for providing reports in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing an internet-based database of patient medical information designed to facilitate patient-authorized, HIPAA-compliant sharing and maintenance of patient medical information amongst a patient's doctors such that this information can be directly inserted into the doctor's medical reports as a means of increasing medical record generation efficiency and accuracy; Collection and compilation of information into computer databases in the field of patient medical information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for securely transmitting, receiving, storing, integrating, tracking, and managing patient-authorized, HIPAA-compliant sharing of text, data, images, photos, videos, messages and patient authorized medical information, for two-way messaging, collaborating with health care professionals, coordinating patient medical care, and for providing reports in connection therewith; Electronic storage of messages, audio, video, images, photos and data; Design and development of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |