USPTO serial 86787399
SHIBUYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2016
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SHIBUYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hiroshima, JP
Hiroshima 738-0021, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S.. Roberts
Richard S.. Roberts ROBERTS & ROBERTS LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAWPO BOX 484PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0484United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Grinding machines for metalworking; broaching machines for metalworking; milling machines for metalworking; perforating machines for metalworking; bending machines for metalworking; cutting machines for metalworking; lapping machines for metalworking; planing machines for metalworking; shaping machines for metalworking; honing machines for metalworking; slotting machines for metalworking; boring machines for metalworking; drilling machines for metalworking; metalworking machine tools; grinding machines for mining; ] drilling machines for mining; [ broaching machines for mining; milling machines for mining; ] cutting machines for mining; [ earthworking machines; loading and unloading machines; grinding machines for woodworking; drilling machines for woodworking; broaching machines for woodworking; milling machines for woodworking; cutting machines for woodworking; plastic processing machines; rubber manufacturing machines; glassware manufacturing machines; ] stone working machines; [ concrete mixers; concrete construction machines; concrete finishing machines; concrete paving machines; concrete placing machines; concrete vibrators; asphalt mixers; asphalt paving machines; ] cutting machines for concrete, reinforced concrete, asphalt, and stone; [ drilling machines for concrete, reinforced concrete, asphalt, and stone; ] perforating machines for concrete, reinforced concrete, asphalt, and stone; grinding machines for concrete, reinforced concrete, asphalt, and stone; milling machines for concrete, reinforced concrete, asphalt, and stone; blades for power tools; core drills being drilling machines; parts for machines, namely, water collection rings for core drills; parts for machines, namely, water collection ring fixtures for core drills; core drilling bits; bits for mining machines; drill bits for rock drilling; tool bits for machines; drills for the mining industry; rock drills; vacuum pumps | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2015 |
| 008 | Hand-powered tools, namely, core drills; parts for hand-operated core drills, namely, water collection rings and drill bits | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |