CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ENSIGHT

USPTO serial 86801703

ENSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5365469Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 26, 2017
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with ENSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erica Goven

Erica Goven Kutak Rock LLP1650 Farnam StreetOmaha, NE 68102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Food processing equipment for commercial use, namely, food cutting machines, food chopping machines, food slicing machines, food processing machines for forming food, food processing machines for shaping food, food processing machines for molding food, food processing machines for tenderizing food, food processing machines for macerating food, food processing machines for flattening food, food processing machines for loading, dumping, and lifting foods, food processing machines for handling food material, food processing machines for reducing food size, food processing machines for blending food, food mixing machines and food conveyorsACTIVEMar 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 13, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 19, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 3, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 26, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 23, 2017SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 1, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 10, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance