Drawing for THE VIBE

USPTO serial 86807548

THE VIBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUNT, LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE VIBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Hwang

Karen Hwang KSH Law Group, LLC441 W. Oakdale Ave. #7EChicago, IL 60657UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel, Namely, hat, beanie, t-shirts, sweatshirts, socks, boxer briefs, scarfs, jacketsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
May 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 17, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 17, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 18, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance