USPTO serial 86844477
BANKLUSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2017
- Examiner
- VIGIL, JACOB EUGENE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BANKLUSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Chelmsford, MA
North Chelmsford, MA
North Chelmsford, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Turk
Christopher Turk The Belles Group, P.C.1800 John F. Kennedy Blvd.Suite 1010Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for facilitating, processing, and administering electronic payment, fund transfers, mobile banking, virtual banking and conventional banking; computer software, namely, mobile applications for smartphones and mobile devices for use in accepting, processing, and utilizing electronic payments and electronic payment methods, money transfers, banking, and payment processing; computer programs downloadable via the Internet for use in making and processing payment transactions; computer software for facilitating, processing, and administering electronic payments, funds transfers, mobile banking, virtual banking, and conventional banking; software development tools for the creation of mobile Internet applications and client interfaces for banking and financial applications; computer software, namely, an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of mobile payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, ATM, POS and web based environment; computer software application for use in making online payments via mobile phones, smart phones, tablet computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), ATM, POS and computers; computer software, namely, an electronic banking infrastructure platform | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Technical consulting services in the fields of electronic banking and banking with mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; providing an electronic platform featuring non-downloadable software for banking; providing an electronic platform featuring non-downloadable software for mobile banking and virtual banking; technical consulting services in the fields of banking technology and cloud computing solutions for mobile financial transactions; providing use of on-line non-downloadable software for processing electronic payments and authentication of parties to electronic payment transactions; cloud computing services for use with banking and financial transactions featuring non-downloadable software for processing banking and financial transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xius Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Xius Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Xius Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BANKLUSIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |