USPTO serial 86872098
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oakville, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Brinza
DANIEL BRINZA DANIEL BRINZA LAW OFFICE1155 NORTH SERVICE ROAD WEST, UNIT 11OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, L6M3E3CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Covers for children's car seats; canopies for children's car seats; Canopies for baby strollers; Covers for baby strollers; Safety seats for infants and children for vehicles; baby strollers; fitted covers for shopping carts, namely, fabric slipcovers designed to cover the entire child seating area of a shopping cart; vehicle windshield sunshades; vehicle window shades; shoulder belt pads; vehicle seat cushions; vehicle accessories, namely, organizers adapted for fitting in vehicles; mirrors for vehicles, namely, rear view baby mirrors | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Baby blankets; shower curtains; hand towels; towels; table mats and covers, bed covers, blankets, linen, spreads and sheets; washcloths; bath towels; hooded towels; children's towels; beach towels; washing mitts; dish cloths; kitchen towels; mosquito nets; Pillowcases; Curtains; nursing covers; crib liners; bibs; cloth diapers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |