USPTO serial 86879785
CSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2018
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with CSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Hargis
Michael S. Hargis Stites & Harbison, PLLC250 West Main Street, Suite 2300Lexington, KY 40507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business risk assessment services; disaster recovery services, namely, business planning and business continuity consulting; conducting business audits in the field of information technology; and consulting services in the field of business risk assessment | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2013 |
| 036 | Consulting services in the field of financial risk assessment | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2013 |
| 041 | Business training in the field of regulatory compliance, business risk mitigation, and business management | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2013 |
| 042 | testing web applications to identify security vulnerabilities in the web applications; computer security review services, namely, reviewing security procedures relating to software that contains customer and institution sensitive information, identifying known and foreseeable security threats and vulnerabilities to the software; testing of security systems, namely, social engineering testing of human networks within financial institutions to strengthen security and regulatory compliance, namely, using physiological tactics to lure employees into divulging confidential information; computer security services in the nature of auditing computer passwords of computer systems in financial institutions to authenticate uses, and identify security vulnerabilities that hackers could detect and exploit; security services, namely, providing computer security assessment in the field of identity theft prevention programs in financial institutions to strengthen security; information security review services, namely, reviewing computer security procedures relating to customer and institution sensitive information, identifying known and foreseeable security threats and vulnerabilities; and updating and maintaining information in computer security programs to avoid future security or data breaches | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2013 |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of security threat assessment; consulting services in the field of banking regulatory compliance; providing information in the field of regulatory compliance for banks; providing information via a web portal in the field of regulatory compliance for banks | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CSI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |