CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BI-LINK

USPTO serial 86884069

BI-LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5193958Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2017
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with BI-LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall T. Erickson

Randall T. Erickson ERICKSON LAW GROUP, PC1749 S. NAPERVILLE RD.SUITE 202WHEATON, IL 60189

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Manufacturing, namely, metal stamping, plastic insertion molding, plastic injection molding, assembling sub-assemblies of manufactured parts with components provided by other vendors, prototype fabrication of new products [ and 3D printing ] for others; prototyping, namely, prototype fabrication of sample parts for new productsACTIVEJan 1, 1984
042Design and engineering services, namely, product concept and development consulting; pre-prototyping consulting, namely, testing the manufacturability of new product concept and design; prototyping, namely, designing sample parts; designing and developing injection mold tooling, metal stamping and fabrication tooling, and fixtures, automation, and assembly systems to produce partsACTIVEJan 1, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2023NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2023C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 31, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance